DescriptionFor hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit (P), does the use of central line bundle (I), compared without the use of central line bundle standards (C), reduces the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (O) within 4 weeks of intensive care unit stay (T)?Using a two-step process, students will evaluate and synthesize the external evidence results from two (2) of the strongest external studies retrieved during the search of the literature that supports the intervention of the PICOT question formulated in Week 1. These are the studies that answer the chosen PICOT question and directly relate to the chosen intervention. The studies must be within the discipline of nursing and not medicine.Assignment Criteria: Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:1. Complete the Evaluation Table Template found in the Week 3 module with the results from the two strongest external evidence studies. a. Pages 179-181 (4th edition) provide detailed explanation of what type of information should be included in each category of the Evaluation Table.2. Determine the strength of each of the two (2) studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (4th edition) page 18 and add the Level for each studyto the evaluation table.a. Information on the evaluation table should be in bulleted format, not sentences.3. Include a legend on the evaluation table.4. Place the completed Evaluation Table as an appendix.5. Write a one-page narrative that analyzes how the evidence from the two studies supports the intervention of the PICOT question. If the evidence does not support the intervention, describe what would be the next step in the evidence-based practice process.6. Include a brief introduction, purpose statement and conclusion. 7. Level 1 headings required.8. Include a title page, reference page and appendix.9. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use we or I) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used. 10. APA 7th edition format is required.11. The assignment does not need to be submitted to Turnitin. 12. Submit the assignment and copies of both studies (PDFs) by the posted due date. For the narrative partLevel 1 headings Evaluate the evidence introductionLevel 1 heading PICOT QuestionLevel 1 heading Evaluation Evidence from Study 1Level 1 heading Evaluation Evidence from Study 2Level 1 heading ConclusionI have two studies in mind1. Central line-associated bloodstream infection reduction and bundle compliance in intensive care unit: a national study by E. Yoko Furuya et al, 20162. Central venous catheter bundle adherence: kamishibai card ( k card) rounding for central line associated bloodstream infection prevention by Jennifer A Ormsby et al, 2020
Making a new website or just turning a new page on the old one? Look no further!Read More
Give us a description of what you need, and we’ll give you the description that you need.Read More
Got something important to tell the Internet? Let us tell them for you.Read More
Shhh, see technical writing before me? Unlike that guy, I’m anything but dull.Read More
All types of technical documentation, written only by certified writers.Read More
We offer money-back guaranteed, no questions asked for up to 14 days.
We offer unlimited revisions for 14 days to ensure you get the final results that you want.
We use strategies that force automated hiring systems to put your resume, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile on the top of their priority list. Your resume is passed through our hiring software to guarantee success